Darwin had a habit. When he finished a book, he went back through it, underlined the passages he had marked, and wrote in the margins what he actually thought — his own reaction, his disagreement, the question the page raised that the author had not thought to ask. By the time he was done with a book, it carried a second book inside it. His.

This had nothing to do with academic annotation. He was not glossing a text for a student; he was thinking in the margins, because the margin was where the thinking happened — beside someone else’s argument, in conversation with it, pushed forward by it without being held inside it. The habit was not occasional. Of the roughly 1,480 books in his library, about 730 carry his notes, some twenty-eight thousand marked pages, catalogued by Mario Di Gregorio and Nick Gill in Charles Darwin’s Marginalia (1990) and now held at Cambridge University Library. He was not the only reader to talk back in another writer’s white space, but few did it as relentlessly.

✦   ✦   ✦

Nabokov worked differently and arrived in the same place. He composed on index cards — lined Bristol cards, a soft pencil, an eraser on the end of it — one scene or passage to a card, the cards shuffled and reordered until the book found its shape. Ada ran past two thousand of them. He told the Paris Review in 1967 that he never wrote in sequence: “the pattern of the thing precedes the thing,” and he filled the gaps wherever he happened to land. A sentence buried in a notebook is pinned under the sentences above it. A sentence on a card can be moved.

✦   ✦   ✦

Newton’s calculus has a similar birthplace. In 1664, when plague closed Cambridge and sent him home to Lincolnshire, he picked up a notebook that had belonged to his stepfather, a clergyman whose half-finished theological notes he had no use for. He wanted the blank pages. He called it the Waste Book and filled the leftover space with the method of fluxions — what we now call calculus. The most consequential mathematics of the century was worked out on paper nobody else had wanted. The Principia itself, twenty years on, started as a heap of manuscript sheets long before it was ever a book.

A page from the handwritten manuscript of Newton's Principia Mathematica, dense with mathematical notation and diagrams
The working manuscript of Newton’s Principia Mathematica, c. 1686, in the hand of his copyist Humphrey Newton. Royal Society, London. Public domain via Wikimedia Commons.
✦   ✦   ✦

The pattern holds across all three. These were working notebooks, not display cases. The thinking happened inside them — sideways, adjacent, in reaction to something already on the page. A notebook will take a thought that is not ready, that does not yet know what it is, that needs to sit beside three other half-formed things you could not throw away before it starts to cohere. The clean page refuses that thought. The margin invites it.

The margin is the part of the page with no official function. That is exactly why it works.

The centre of the page is where you put what you mean to say. The margin is where you put what you actually think.

In an A6 grid, every line is potential margin. The grid does not rank the main thought above the aside. It gives them the same five millimetres, the same neutral working surface. A diagram sits next to a fragment of prose sits next to a single word you could not place and could not discard. The notebook does not know which of them matters. Neither do you, yet.

That is the case for keeping the margin open. The thing arrives there before you know it has arrived, and if you wait until you can tell whether it is worth writing, you will already have lost it. Calculus, a theory of life, a few strange and perfect novels — on the first day, each of them looked like a stray mark in the space beside someone else’s argument.

Keep the margin open. Whatever comes next will reach for it first.

References

  • Di Gregorio, M. A. & Gill, N. W. (1990). Charles Darwin’s Marginalia, Vol. 1. Garland Publishing.
  • Newton, I. (from 1664). Waste Book (MS Add.4004). Cambridge University Library.
  • Nabokov, V. (1967). The Art of Fiction No. 40. Interview by Herbert Gold. The Paris Review.