Joan Didion kept a notebook because, as she wrote in “On Keeping a Notebook” (1968), she did not trust herself to remember accurately. Not facts — she understood that notebooks are terrible at facts. What she could not recover without writing it down was the feeling of a moment: the cracked crab at a restaurant in the Forties, the woman in the plaid silk dress, the particular quality of light on an afternoon that had made her feel something she could not yet name. She was not recording what happened. She was parking the experience somewhere she could return to — weeks later, months later, whenever the work required a texture that memory alone could not supply.

Didion was clear about this. The notebook was not a diary and was not pretending to be one. It was a deposit box for emotional information that would lose its specificity if left unwritten, because memory edits without asking permission.

✦   ✦   ✦

Vladimir Nabokov composed on index cards — 3-by-5-inch cards, pencil, standing at a lectern or sitting in the passenger seat while his wife Vera drove him across the American West on butterfly-collecting expeditions. Each card held a fragment: a sentence, a scene, a note to himself about the right word. He did not write his novels from beginning to end. He wrote them in pieces and then arranged and rearranged the pieces until the structure declared itself. Lolita was composed this way. Ada, his longest novel at 589 pages, was written across more than 2,000 cards. His final, unfinished novel The Original of Laura was published in 2009 as 138 handwritten cards — perforated so the reader could tear them out and rearrange them, which is the closest a publisher has ever come to reproducing a writer’s actual process.

“There is the first satisfaction of arranging it on a bit of paper.”

— Vladimir Nabokov

The arranging was the work. The card was where the fragment waited until the work was ready for it.

Both Didion and Nabokov practised the same discipline from different directions. Didion saved emotional texture. Nabokov saved structural fragments. Neither of them elaborated at the point of capture. The elaboration happened later, when the mind had time and quiet enough to do the assembly. The notebook held the material in trust.

✦   ✦   ✦

This is what idea parking is. Inspiration and execution are different activities, and they almost never happen at the same time. The idea arrives on the bus, in a meeting, mid-conversation with someone who requires your attention. Developing it fully at that moment is impractical and often damaging — the rushed draft is worse than no draft, because it convinces you the idea has been handled when it has only been mangled. But the note taken quickly, the fragment caught before the moment closes — that can be everything, because everything that follows depends on the fragment surviving.

F. Scott Fitzgerald understood this with the precision of a man who watched his own material disappear. He kept his Notebooks from 1932 until his death in 1940 — more than 2,000 entries, sorted into 23 categories he had devised himself, from “Anecdotes” to “Youth and Army.” Matthew Bruccoli, who edited them for publication in 1978, described their function: Fitzgerald needed somewhere to bank “the strippings from his short stories.” When he decided a story would not be reprinted, he went through it passage by passage, pulled the lines that had worked — a piece of dialogue, an image, a description — and copied them into the Notebooks. The fragments he caught at parties in the 1920s reappeared, refined and repositioned, in Tender Is the Night a decade later. The gap between capture and use was sometimes ten years. But the material survived because it had been parked, and the parking spot was a page.

✦   ✦   ✦

The pocket notebook is not where the work gets done. The work happens at the desk, in the afternoon, when you have two hours and the page open in front of you and the fragment you caught last Tuesday that was nothing at the time and is now, looked at differently, the beginning of something you can use.

The A6 format is sized for parking, not developing. A single page holds a sentence, a handful of lines, a quick diagram, a name. It does not hold a full essay or a completed argument. That constraint is correct. The small page is the right tool for this specific job: catch the thought, set it down, go back to what you were doing. The thought does not need you right now. It needs a surface, and then it needs time.

The writers who fill notebooks and produce nothing are usually trying to develop on the spot — making the notebook do work it was never designed for. The writers who fill notebooks and produce a great deal are parking: collecting without judging, trusting that the collection will become useful when the time comes to use it. Didion’s cracked crab at the restaurant. Nabokov’s 2,000 cards. Fitzgerald’s decade of strippings from stories no one would read again. All of it parked. All of it used.

Park first. Develop later.

The time between them is the idea working on itself.

References

  • Didion, J. (1968). “On Keeping a Notebook.” In Slouching Towards Bethlehem. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  • Nabokov, V. (2009). The Original of Laura: A Novel in Fragments. Penguin.
  • Fitzgerald, F.S. (1978). The Notebooks of F. Scott Fitzgerald. Ed. Matthew J. Bruccoli. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.